QUALITY CONTROL OF MULTI-SLICE CT-SCAN AIRCRAFT USING PHANTOM CHART MODEL 610 AT MAKASSAR HAJI HOSPITAL
DOI:
10.29303/ipr.v5i1.136Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to determine and analyze the quality control phantom chart of a CT-scan plane from the CT number's accuracy, the CT number's uniformity, and the uniformity of noise against the phantom. The AAPM CT Performance Phantom with the model 610 offers a single object to measure several different CT performance parameters. The Phantom design is based on the guidelines presented in the AAPM. From the measurement results, the accuracy of the CT number is still following the tolerance standard; namely, the value of passing the test ± 4 for the accuracy of the CT number, and the value of passing the test 2 is the uniformity of the CT number. Based on the Standard Regulations of the Head of the Nuclear Energy Supervisory Agency, stating that the value of accuracy and uniformity of the CT number from the CT scan image obtained in research conducted on a multi-slice CT scan plane at the Radiology Installation of the Makassar Haji Regional General Hospital shows the value of passing the test or still within PERKA BAPETEN standard.Keywords:
Ct scan, AAPM Phantom Performance and Image QualityReferences
K. sato, M. Abe and T. Takatsuji. 2019. Characterization of Resolution Performance of Novel High Energy X-CT: eXTRACT. Vol. 54. Hal 276.
T. A. Bjarnason, R. Rees, J. Kainz, et al. 2019. A Survey of Radiation Safety Regulations For Medical Imaging X-Ray Equipment in Canada. Vol. 21, No. 3, 2019. Hal 10-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12708
Sofiyatun, C. Anam, Zahro, Rukmana & Dougherty. 2021. An Automated Measurement of Image Slice Thickness of Computed Tomography. Vol. 47, No. 2, 2021. Hal 121-128. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2021.1111
A. Joon, Jaeman, Hyeongmin, Jiwon & Chun Minsoo. 2019. Acceptance Test and Clinical Commissioning of CT Simulator. Vol. 30, No. 4, December 2019. Hal 160-167. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2019.30.4.160
F. van Ommen, E. Bennink, A. Vlassenbroek, et al. 2018. Image Quality of Conventional Images of Dual – Layer SPECTRAL CT: A Phantom Study. Vol. 45, No. 7, 2018. Hal 3331-3042. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12959
[[6] Leccese Francesco, Savadori Giacomo, Carlo, Andrea & Michele. 2017. Lighting Assessment Of Ergonomic Workstation For Radio Diagnostic Reporting. Vol. 57, January 2017. Hal 42-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.11.005
Abdullah, Mark & L. Kench. 2018. Development Of an Organ-Specific Insert Phantom Generated Using 3D Printer For Investigations Of Cardiac Computed Tomography Protocols. Vol. 65, No. 3 September 2018. Hal 175-183. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.279
Loniza, Amukti, Bariton Subhan & Rughaisyiah. 2020. Dosimeter Co-Card Alarm X-ray Radiation Dosage Monitoring Instrument. Vol. 1471, Oktober 2020. Hal 1-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012041
Stiller Wolfram. 2018. Basics of Iterative Reconstruction Methods in Computed Tomography: A Vender Independent Overview. Vol. 109, December 2018. Hal 147-154. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.025
Ghaznavi Hamid. 2020. Thyroid Cancer Risk in Patients Undergoing 64 Slice Brain and Paranasal Sinuses Computed Tomography. Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2020. Hal 100-104. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v7i2.3855
Maura, Oliveira & Silva. 2020. Self-Assessment Of Radiological Protection In Dental Radiodiagnosis services Based On Protaria SVS/MS NËš 453/98. Vol. 8, No. 2, April 2020. Hal 01-13.
Lee Baek Ki, Nam Chang Ki, et. al. 2021. Feasibility Of The Quantitative Assessment Method For CT Quality Control in Phantom Image Evaluation. Vol. 11, No. 8, April 2021. Hal 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083570
Seong-Myeong Yoon, Min-Soon Hong & Kyoon-Dong Han. 2018. A Study On The Fabrication and Comparison Of The Phantom For Computed Tomography Image Quality Measurements Using Three-Dimensions Printing Technology. Vol. 41, No. 6, November 2018. Hal 595-602.
G. Oliver, Salgado, Salgado, Buls Nico, Isabelle, Dendale Paul & Nchimi Alain. 2017. Image Quality in Coronary CT Angiography: Challenges and Technical Studios. Vol. 90. No. 1072, Maret 2017. Hal 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160567
C. Anam, Adi, Sutanto, Arifin, Budi, Fujibuchi & Dougherty. 2020. Noise Reduction in CT Image Using a Selective Mean Filter. Vol. 10, No. 5, Oktober 2020. Hal 623-634. Doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2002-1072
L. Nani, A. Choirul, H. Eko & D. Geoff. 2021. Automated Procedure For Slice Thickness Verification of Computed Tomography Images: Variations of Slice Thickness Position From Iso-Center, and Reconstruction Filter. Vol. 22, No. 7, Mei 2021. 313-321. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13317
License
Authors who publish with Indonesian Physical Review Journal, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY SA-4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Physical Review Journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
