Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

SENSITIVITY OF THE PARAMETRIZED POST NEWTONIAN PARAMETER γPPN TO COSMOLOGICAL MODELS IN STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

Authors

Yasmin Mufidanisa , Agustina Widiyani , Azrul Sulaiman Karim Pohan , Ikah Ning Prasetiowati Permanasari , Annisa Novia Indra Putri

DOI:

10.29303/ipr.v9i2.680

Downloads

Received: Apr 16, 2026
Accepted: May 26, 2026
Published: May 27, 2026

Abstract

The parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) parameter γ measures spacetime curvature per unit gravitational potential, with general relativity (GR) predicting γ = 1 exactly. Strong gravitational lensing at galactic scales offers a cosmological-scale avenue for estimating γ beyond solar system experiments; however, such estimates depend sensitively on angular diameter distances, which in turn depend on the assumed cosmological model. We perform a controlled sensitivity analysis using 40 Sloan Lens ACS (SLACS) strong lensing systems with catalogue SIE Einstein masses MEin fixed under a fiducial ΛCDM cosmology, while varying the background model across ΛCDM, wCDM, Dynamical Dark Energy (DDE), and Early Dark Energy (EDE), all adopting Planck 2018 parameters. Angular diameter distances are computed by numerically integrating the model-specific expansion function E(z), so that any variation in recovered γPPN reflects cosmological distance geometry rather than a gravitational signal. ΛCDM, wCDM, and DDE yield effectively degenerate estimates: mean γ ≈ 1.08 ± 0.020, with inter-model spread of only ~0.5–0.7%. EDE yields a systematically lower mean γ = 0.903 ± 0.019, approximately 16.3% below ΛCDM and below the GR prediction of unity. This shift arises because EDE elevates H(z) near matter-radiation equality (z ~ 3000), compressing angular diameter distances by ~10% relative to ΛCDM; since the γ estimator scales as DL × DS / DLS, this compression propagates into a downward shift in recovered γ. The total inter-model range of ~17% substantially exceeds statistical uncertainties in targeted lensing studies, establishing cosmological model selection as a leading systematic in lensing-based γ measurements. EDE in particular introduces a distinctive geometric signature not captured by late-time dark energy parameterizations. Because MEin is fixed under ΛCDM, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence for or against GR, but as a geometric sensitivity analysis within a specific set of modeling assumptions.

Keywords:

strong gravitational lensing PPN parameter γ cosmological models early dark energy SLACS angular diameter distance Hubble tension

References

[1] A. Einstein, “Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation,” Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 844–847, 1915.

[2] B. F. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[3] A. S. Eddington, “The deflection of light during a solar eclipse,” Nature, vol. 104, p. 372, 1919.

[4] T. Li, T. E. Collett, C. M. Krawczyk, and W. Enzi, “Cosmology from large populations of galaxy–galaxy strong gravitational lenses,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 527, no. 3, pp. 5311–5323, 2024.

[5] A. J. Shajib, G. P. Smith, and others, “Strong lensing by galaxies,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 220, no. 6, p. 87, 2024.

[6] E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

[7] C. M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, Rev. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[8] C. M. Will, “The confrontation between general relativity and experiment,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 4, 2014.

[9] B. Bertotti, L. Iess, and P. Tortora, “A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6956, pp. 374–376, 2003.

[10] S. Cao, X. Li, M. Biesiada, T. Xu, Y. Cai, and Z.-H. Zhu, “Test of parametrized post-Newtonian gravity with galaxy-scale strong lensing systems,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 835, no. 1, p. 92, 2017.

[11] X.-H. Liu, Z.-H. Li, J.-Z. Qi, and X. Zhang, “Galaxy-scale test of general relativity with strong gravitational lensing,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 927, no. 1, p. 28, 2022.

[12] J.-J. Wei, Y. Chen, S. Cao, and X.-F. Wu, “Direct estimate of the post-Newtonian parameter and cosmic curvature from galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 927, no. 1, p. L1, 2022.

[13] T. Liu, M. Biesiada, S. Tian, and K. Liao, “Robust test of general relativity at the galactic scales by combining strong lensing systems and gravitational wave standard sirens,” Physical Review D, vol. 109, no. 8, p. 084074, 2024.

[14] M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 213–223, 2001.

[15] E. V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, no. 9, p. 091301, 2003.

[16] V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski, “Early dark energy can resolve the Hubble tension,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 122, no. 22, p. 221301, 2019.

[17] V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, and T. Karwal, “The ups and downs of early dark energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023,” Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 42, p. 101348, 2023.

[18] E. Di Valentino et al., “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 38, no. 15, p. 153001, 2021.

[19] M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, “The Hubble tension and early dark energy,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 73, pp. 153–180, 2023.

[20] L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, “Tensions between the early and the late universe,” Nature Astronomy, vol. 3, pp. 891–895, 2019.

[21] M. Bartelmann, M. Doran, and C. Wetterich, “Non-linear structure formation in cosmologies with early dark energy,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 454, pp. 27–36, 2006.

[22] C. Fedeli and M. Bartelmann, “Effects of early dark energy on strong cluster lensing,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 461, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2007.

[23] Y. Shu et al., “The SLACS survey for the masses: Breaking the degeneracy between total mass profile and anisotropy distribution,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 851, no. 1, p. 48, 2017.

[24] A. Pohan, “Cosmological perturbation theory : scale-free models and cosmology dependence,” Theses, Sorbonne Université, 2023.

[25] M. Meneghetti, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing: With Python Examples, vol. 956. in Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 956. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021.

[26] F. Courbin and D. Minniti, Gravitational Lensing: An Astrophysical Tool, vol. 608. in Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 608. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2002.

[27] N. Aghanim and others, “Planck 2018 results VI: Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 641, p. A6, 2020.

[28] L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[29] J. An, B. Chang, and L. Xu, “Cosmic constraints to wCDM model from strong gravitational lensing,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 33, no. 7, p. 079801, 2016.

[30] P. Virtanen et al., “SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python,” Nature Methods, vol. 17, pp. 261–272, 2020.

[31] R. Kormann, P. Schneider, and M. Bartelmann, “Isothermal elliptical gravitational lens models,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 284, pp. 285–299, 1994.

[32] K. Leaf and F. Melia, “Model selection with strong-lensing systems,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 478, no. 4, pp. 5104–5111, 2018.

[33] The Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, and others, “The Astropy Project: Sustaining and growing a community-developed open-source project and status of the v2.0 core package,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 156, no. 3, p. 123, 2018.

[34] S. Birrer et al., “Time-Delay Cosmography: Measuring the Hubble Constant and Other Cosmological Parameters with Strong Gravitational Lensing,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 220, no. 5, p. 48, Jun. 2024.

[35] S. Birrer and T. Treu, “TDCOSMO V: Strategies for precise and accurate measurements of the Hubble constant with strong lensing,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 649, p. A61, 2021.

[36] K. Rojas and others, “Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1): The strong lensing discovery engine B — Early strong lens candidates from high velocity dispersion galaxies.” 2025.

Author Biographies

Yasmin Mufidanisa, Master Program of Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan 35365, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Agustina Widiyani, Master Program of Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan 35365, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Azrul Sulaiman Karim Pohan, Master Program of Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan 35365, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Ikah Ning Prasetiowati Permanasari, Master Program of Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan 35365, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Annisa Novia Indra Putri, Atmospheric and Planetary Science Department, Faculty of Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan 35365, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Mufidanisa, Y., Widiyani, A., Pohan, A. S. K., Permanasari, I. N. P., & Putri, A. N. I. (2026). SENSITIVITY OF THE PARAMETRIZED POST NEWTONIAN PARAMETER γPPN TO COSMOLOGICAL MODELS IN STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING. Indonesian Physical Review, 9(2), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.29303/ipr.v9i2.680

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.