AFTERSHOCK CHARACTERISTICS OF THE 2018 PALU EARTHQUAKE: IMPLICATIONS FOR SUPERSHEAR RUPTURE SEGMENT
DOI:
10.29303/ipr.v9i2.666Downloads
Abstract
A temporary nodal array was deployed shortly after the Mw 7.5 Palu earthquake in September 2018 to record the aftershocks. Here, we present high-resolution aftershock locations and moment tensors, obtained from the temporary array combined with permanent broadband stations. The results are used to define the fault geometry and seismogenic depth. We find that there are very few aftershocks along a long, straight section of the Palu-Koro fault, which ruptured at supershear speed. Aftershocks tend to cluster north and south of this straight section. Secondary strike-slip faults to the south and east of the main fault were triggered. Additionally, we record an earthquake swarm occurring in the Adang volcanic zone, which began approximately 1 month after the mainshock. Given the smaller number and lower magnitude of aftershocks, we suggest that supershear ruptures pose a lower seismic hazard than corresponding subshear earthquakes. However, the strong shaking from a supershear rupture may pose other hazards, such as disastrous liquefaction. Lastly, we suggest that the ability to deploy short-period nodal arrays rapidly makes them a powerful tool for aftershock studies.
Keywords:
Supershear rupture Palu-Koro Fault Aftershock pattern Nodal array Focal mechanismReferences
[1] K. Chen, G. Wei, C. Milliner, C. Liang, J. Avouac, and L. D. Zilio, “Super-shear ruptures steered by pre-stress heterogeneities during the 2023 Kahramanmara ş earthquake doublet,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, pp. 1–11, 2024.
[2] Z. Zhang, J. Xu, H. Huang, and X. Chen, “Seismic characteristics of supershear and sub-Rayleigh earthquakes : Implication from simple cases,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 44, pp. 6712–6717, 2017.
[3] P. Bernard and D. Baumont, “Shear Mach wave characterization for kinematic fault rupture models with constant supershear rupture velocity,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 162, pp. 431–447, 2005.
[4] E. M. Dunham and R. J. Archuleta, “Near-Source Ground Motion from Steady State Dynamic Rupture Pulses,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 32, no. 3, 2004.
[5] T. H. W. Goebel, E. E. Brodsky, and G. Dresen, “Fault Roughness Promotes Earthquake-Like Aftershock Clustering in the Lab Geophysical Research Letters,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1–11, 2023.
[6] M. Bouchon and H. Karabulut, “The Aftershock Signature of Supershear Earthquakes,” Science (80-. )., vol. 320, no. 5881, pp. 1323-1325, 2008.
[7] H. Bao et al., “Early and persistent supershear rupture of the 2018 magnitude 7 . 5 Palu earthquake,” Nat. Geosci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 200–205, 2025.
[8] A. Socquet et al., “Evidence of supershear during the 2018 magnitude 7.5 Palu earthquake from space geodesy,” Nat. Geosci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 192–199, 2019.
[9] W. Simons et al., “A Tsunami Generated by a Strike-Slip Event : Constraints From GPS and SAR Data on the 2018 Palu Earthquake,” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, vol. 127, no. 12, 2022.
[10] M. G. Cilia, W. D. Mooney, and C. Nugroho. “Field Insights and Analysis of the 2018 Mw 7 . 5 Palu, Indonesia Earthquake, Tsunami and Landslides,” Pure Appl. Geophys., vol. 178, no. 12, pp. 4891–4920, 2021.
[11] T. Kiyota, H. Furuichi, R. Faris, N. Tada, and H. Nawir, “Overview of long-distance flow-slide caused by the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia,” Soils Found., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 722–735, 2020.
[12] A. Triyanti et al., “Governing systemic and cascading disaster risk in Indonesia: where do we stand and future outlook Annisa,” Disaster Prev. Manag. An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 27–48, 2026.
[13] S. Al Idrus, “Political Change and Urban Growth in a Medium-sized Outer Island Capital in Indonesia : The Case of Palu, Central Sulawesi Dissertation for the award of the degree " Doctor rerum naturalium " of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen within the doctoral,” Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 2022.
[14] L. Krenz et al., “3D Acoustic-Elastic Coupling with Gravity : The Dynamics of the 2018 Palu, Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami,” in Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2021, pp. 1–14.
[15] Nurdin, Marzuki, D. Arisa, and V. Friska, “Seismic Deformation Analysis of the 28th September 2018 Palu Earthquake ( 7 . 5 Mw ) Using InaCORS Station Data and Okada Model,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2154–2161, 2024.
[16] I. M. Watkinson and R. Hall, “Fault systems of the eastern Indonesian triple junction: Evaluation of Quaternary activity and implications for seismic hazards,” Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., vol. 441, no. 1, pp. 71–120, 2017.
[17] J. Fang, C. Xu, Y. Wen, S. Wang, G. Xu, and Y. Zhao, “The 2018 Mw 7 . 5 Palu Earthquake : A Supershear Rupture Event Constrained by InSAR and Broadband Regional Seismograms,” Remote Sens., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1–15, 2018.
[18] Y. Wang, W. Feng, K. Chen, and S. Samsonov, “Source Characteristics of the 28 September 2018 Mw 7 . 4 Palu, Indonesia, Earthquake Derived from the Advanced Land Observation Satellite 2 Data,” Remote Sens., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1–16, 2019.
[19] J. Yao, D. Yao, F. Chen, M. Zhi, L. Sun, and D. Wang, “Editorial A Preliminary Catalog of Early Aftershocks Following the 7 January 2025 M S 6 . 8 Dingri, Xizang Earthquake,” J. Earth Sci., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 856–860, 2025.
[20] J. Omojola and P. Persaud, “Detecting Urban Earthquakes with the San Fernando Valley Nodal Array and Machine Learning,” Seismol. Res. Lett., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 111–125, 2026.
[21] Y. Sheng, Q. Kong, and G. C. Beroza, “Network analysis of earthquake ground motion spatial correlation : a case study with the San Jacinto seismic nodal array,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 225, pp. 1704–1713, 2021.
[22] F. Waldhauser and W. L. Ellsworth, “A Double-difference Earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1353–1368, 2000.
[23] N. A. Simmons, S. C. Myers, and G. Johannesson, “LLNL-G3Dv3 : global P-wave tomography model for improved regional and teleseismic travel time prediction,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 117, no. B10, 2012.
[24] H. Jayadi, G. Rachman, I. U. Meidji, M. Fawzy, I. Massinai, and D. D. Warnana, “A Non-Linear Hypocenter Localization along the Active Palu- Koro Fault: A Case Study Central Sulawesi,” Indones. Phys. Rev., vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 400–416, 2025.
[25] S. Rasimeng et al., “Hypocenter dimension of 7 . 5 mw Palu earthquake using fractal approach Hypocenter dimension of 7 . 5 mw Palu earthquake using fractal approach,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, pp. 1–10.
[26] L. Zhu and D. V Helmberger, “Advancement in Source Estimation Techniques Using Broadband Regional Seismograms,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1634–1641, 1996.
[27] Li, Xiaobin, Mingpei Jin, Ya Huang, Wenjian Cha, Jun Wang, and Sihai Li. "Temporal evolution of the focal mechanism consistency of the 2021 Yangbi MS 6.4 earthquake sequence in Yunnan." Earthquake Research Advances 2, no. 2, 2022.
[28] A. Socquet et al., “Microblock rotations and fault coupling in SE Asia triple junction ( Sulawesi, Indonesia ) from GPS and earthquake slip vector data,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 111, pp. 1–15, 2006.
[29] C. Stevens, R. McCaffrey, C. Subarya, and C. Vigny, “Rapid rotations about a vertical axis in a collisional setting revealed by the Palu fault, Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 2677–2680, 1999.
[30] A. Walpersdorf and P. Manurung, “Monitoring of the Palu-Koro Fault (Sulawesi) by GPS,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 2313–2316, 1998.
[31] D. H. Natawidjaja et al., “The 2018 Mw7.5 Palu ‘supershear’ earthquake ruptures geological fault’s multisegment separated by large bends: Results from integrating field measurements, LiDAR, swath bathymetry and seismic-reflection data,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 985–1002, 2021.
[32] G. Bacques, M. De Michele, M. Foumelis, D. Raucoules, A. Lemoine, and P. Briole, “Sentinel optical and SAR data highlights multi-segment faulting during the 2018 Palu-Sulawesi earthquake ( M w 7 . 5 ),” Sci. Rep., pp. 1–11, 2020.
[33] A. Ansal, Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, vol. 2. Springer Nature, 2015.
[34] B. Ahadov and J. Sh, “The Impact of Coulomb Stress Changes of the 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu Earthquake, Indonesia,” Earth Sci., vol. 2, pp. 14–25, 2023.
[35] L. D. Zilio and J. Ampuero, “Earthquake doublet in Turkey and Syria,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2023.
[36] Y. Yukutake, K. Yoshida, and R. Honda, “Interaction Between Aseismic Slip and Fluid Invasion in Earthquake Swarms Revealed by Dense Geodetic and Seismic Observations,” J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2022.
[37] G. Shaban and B. Priadi, “Geochemical Signatures of Potassic to Sodic Adang Volcanics, Western Sulawesi : Implications for Their Tectonic Setting and Origin. Large parts of the Western Sulawesi Province are covered by thick ( up to 5000 m ) piles of Upper Cenozoic shoshonitic to.” Indones. J. Geosci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 197–216, 2021.
[38] A. M. Dziewonski and D. L. Anderson, “Preliminary reference Earth model,” Phys. of the Earth and Planetary Inter., vol. 25, pp. 297–356, 1981.
[39] B. L. N. Kennett and E. R. Engdah, “Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 105, pp. 429–465, 1991.
[40] P. A. Reasenberg and L. M. Jones, “Earthquake aftershocks: update.” Science (80-), vol. 265, no. 5176, pp. 1251–1253, 1994.
[41] R. Fonzetti, A. Govoni, P. De Gori, and C. Chiarabba, “earthquake with ML methods,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 239, pp. 99–111, 2024.
[42] P. Wessel et al., “The Generic Mapping Tools Version 6,” Geochemistry, Geophys. Geosystems, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 5556–5564, 2019.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Indonesian Physical Review Journal, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY SA-4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Physical Review Journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
