DESIGN AND SELECTION OF PADDLE MATERIALS FOR HIGH-LEVEL ROWING COMPETITION APPLICATIONS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
Authors
Aditya Eka Nurfitrah , Iksan Riva Nanda , Anne Zulfia SyahrialDOI:
10.29303/ipr.v8i1.355Published:
2024-11-11Issue:
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)Keywords:
Paddle Performance; MCDA Analysis; Structural integrity; CFRP Materials; Rowing CompetitionsArticles
Downloads
Additional Files
How to Cite
Abstract
The study evaluated a variety of material alternatives including wood, bamboo, carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), and ceramics for use in high-performance paddleboard. The selection process considers factors such as strength, density, cost, and durability with a focus on the most relevant material criteria for the product. The weighted addition method is used to evaluate and rank several alternative materials that have been selected based on these criteria. Wood and bamboo are chosen for their sustainability, CFRP for their superior strength-to-weight ratio, and ceramics for their resistance to extreme conditions. The study found that CFRP had the highest score of around 85.40 due to its superior strength and lightweight. The framework proposed in this study could provide tools for rowing teams to optimize paddle materials so that they offer the potential for increased speed and performance in the competition.References
B. K. Filter, ‘Design and materials in rowing’, in Materials in Sports Equipment, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 375–401. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102582-6.00013-7.
J. A. Meyer, ‘Wood-plastic materials and their current commercial applications’, Polym Plast Technol Eng, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 181–206, Jan. 1977, doi: 10.1080/03602557708055839.
M. Baysal, ‘Greenland Paddle in Carbon Fiber with a Split’, Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 2011. Accessed: Jun. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://odr.chalmers.se/server/api/core/bitstreams/ad55ed0b-f1ec-4150-a14e-f426be70ce32/content
R. Kendre, ‘Alternate Materials for Glass Fibre’, Adv Mat Res, vol. 1077, pp. 3–7, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1077.3.
Ş. Bozkurt Uzan, M. Subasi, and M. Vural Allaham, ‘Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches For Evaluation Of Equipment Selection Processes In Rowing’, Ankara Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, pp. 211–222, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.33689/spormetre.858650.
J. V Sai and P. Kumar, ‘Multiple Decision Criterion for Material Selection by using Ranking System’, Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1–06, May 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i12.7253.
D. Setti, M. N. Verona, B. B. Medeiros, and A. Restelli, ‘Materials selection using a 2-tuple linguistic multi-criteria method’, Materials Research, vol. 22, 2019, doi: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2018-0846.
P.K. Chidambaram, C. Sivaji, A. Murugan, and M. Ramachandran, ‘Performance Analysis of Materials Selection Using Weighted Product Method (WPM)’, Journal on Materials and its Characterization, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–45, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.46632/jmc/1/1/5.
R. Mircea, ‘Acta Technicia Napocensis Multicriterial Selection Of Plastic Materials In The Design Process’, Acta Technicia Napocensis - Series: Applied Mathematics, Mechanics, and Engineering, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 245–250, Jun. 2017, Accessed: Jun. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://atna-mam.utcluj.ro/index.php/Acta/article/view/879
A. Simkus, V. Navickas, J. Vveinhardt, and A. Alekrinskis, ‘The Technical Parameters of the Creation Process for Kayak Paddles as a Sport Product’, Ann Appl Sport Sci, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.29252/aassjournal.845.
E. M. Abdelkader, A. Al-Sakkaf, and G. Alfalah, ‘Optimizing material selection using a hybridized multi-attribute decision making model’, WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control, vol. 16, pp. 404–421, 2021, doi: 10.37394/23203.2021.16.36.
S. Zakeri, P. Chatterjee, D. Konstantas, and F. Ecer, ‘A decision analysis model for material selection using simple ranking process’, Sci Rep, vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35405-z.
P. T. R. Swain and S. Biswas, ‘Selection of materials using multi criteria decision making method by considering physical and mechanical properties of jute/Al2O3 composites’, in Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2014, pp. 729–733. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.729.
A. Jahan, K. L. Edwards, and M. Bahraminasab, ‘Multi-criteria decision-making for materials selection’, in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 63–80. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100536-1.00004-7.
G. Oghenewiroro Odu, ‘Multi-criteria decision making/selection using weighted sum method and team-compromise instrument’, Industrial Engineering Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 64–78, 2018, Accessed: Jun. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IEL/article/view/43875
W. C. Dean, ‘Ergonomic Canoe Paddle’, US006042438A, Mar. 18, 2000
F. Erazo, J. Laliberte, X. Huang, and C. L. Benard, ‘An Investigation of the Failure Mechanisms of a Polymer Matrix Composite Crew Oar’, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 716–729, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11668-019-00651-9.
Y. Liu and M. Guan, ‘Selected physical, mechanical, and insulation properties of carbon fiber fabric-reinforced composite plywood for carriage floors’, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 995–1007, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00107-019-01467-y.
M. Ware, ‘Racing Paddle and Method of Making The Same’, US4061106, Dec. 06, 1977
A. Mital, A. Desai, A. Subramanian, and A. Mital, ‘Consideration and Selection of Materials’, in Product Development, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 109–132. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-799945-6.00005-3.
C. L. Simões, L. M. Costa Pinto, R. Simoes, and C. A. Bernardo, ‘Integrating environmental and economic life cycle analysis in product development: A material selection case study’, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1734–1746, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0561-9.
B. R. Allenby, ‘A Design For Environment Methodology For Evaluating Materials’, Environmental Systems Design and Implementation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 69–84, 1996, doi: doi:10.1002/tqem.3310050409.
M. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Fourth Edition. United States: Elsevier, 2011.
F. K. Fuss, S. Fundel, Y. Weizman, and R. M. Smith, ‘Smart Oar Blade for Hydrodynamic Analysis of Rowing’, in Procedia Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, 2016, pp. 735–740. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.268.
A. Coppel, T. N. Gardner, N. Caplan, and D. M. Hargreaves, ‘Simulating the fluid dynamic behaviour of oar blades in competition rowing’, Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 25–35, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1243/17543371JSET37.
P. Sirisalee, M. F. Ashby, G. T. Parks, and P. J. Clarkson, ‘Multi-criteria material selection of monolithic and multi-materials in engineering design’, Adv Eng Mater, vol. 8, no. 1–2, pp. 48–56, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1002/adem.200500196.
G. Harih, M. Borovinsek, Z. Ren, and B. Dolsak, ‘Optimal products’ hand-handle interface parameter identification’, International Journal of Simulation Modelling, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 404–415, 2015, doi: 10.2507/IJSIMM14(3)3.285.
M. M. jerzy; L. E. P.-P. I. R. B. K. S. J. P. B. Skublewska-Paszkowska, ‘Motion Capture As a Modern Technology For Analysing Ergometer Rowing’, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 29, pp. 132–140, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.12913/22998624/61941.
T. Turner, R. Smith, and C. Draper, ‘Design, validation and application of an unobtrusive oar force-angle measurement system’, in 33rd International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports, Poitiers., F. Colloud, M. Domalain, and T. Monnet, Eds., France, Jun. 2015, pp. 727–730.
B. J. Larson and L. F. Gunnel, ‘Ergonomic Paddle Grip’, USOO6537117B1, Mar. 25, 2003
X. Xu, ‘Research on material features in design technique of tennis materials’, in Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, pp. 47–51. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.214.47.
E. Cetkin, S. Lorente, and A. Bejan, ‘Constructal paddle design with “fingers”’, J Appl Phys, vol. 113, no. 19, May 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4804961.
A. Jahan, K. L. Edwards, and M. Bahraminasab, ‘Materials selection in the context of design problem-solving’, in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design, Second Edition., Cambridge: Elsevier, 2016, ch. 2, pp. 25–40.
K. R. Al-Momani and J. E. A. Qudeiri, ‘Definition of Flexible Transfer Line with Rework Paths and Its Simulator for Optimal Production Design’.
C. H. Glock and M. Y. Jaber, ‘A multi-stage production-inventory model with learning and forgetting effects, rework and scrap’, Comput Ind Eng, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 708–720, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2012.08.018.
M. Rajak Dipen Kumar and Gupta, ‘Materials Selection and Design Considerations’, in An Insight Into Metal Based Foams: Processing, Properties and Applications, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 53–80. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_4.
J. Choi, ‘Material Selection: Exploring the Reliability of Material Perception Data and Its Relevance to Materials’, Metals and Materials International, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1599–1604, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12540-019-00574-y.
S. Ramdhani and J. Jamari, ‘The Modeling of A Conceptual Engineering Design System Using the Decision-Matrix Logic’, in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, Mar. 2018. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815902022.
M. Alemi-Ardakani, A. S. Milani, S. Yannacopoulos, and G. Shokouhi, ‘On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites’, Expert Syst Appl, vol. 46, pp. 426–438, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.003.
R. S. Duryat, ‘The screwdriver: A basic review on design and material selection’, in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Sep. 2020. doi: 10.1063/5.0016431.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Indonesian Physical Review Journal, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY SA-4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Indonesian Physical Review Journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).